This Bill seeks to provide for the regulation of the private security industry, to provide for a framework for cooperation with National Security Organs.
Find it here The Private Security Regulation Bill 2014
This Bill seeks to provide for the regulation of the private security industry, to provide for a framework for cooperation with National Security Organs.
Find it here The Private Security Regulation Bill 2014
The word honorable is a title indicating eminence or distinction. A person holding the title is therefore supposed to be revered especially through actions. This however is not the case with regard to many elected representatives. Some of their behavior in public forums brings into question the judgment of the voters who elected them.
Even so, there are certainly some representatives who work hard for the public. Sometimes the impact of their work may not be immediately visible, but inside the house their comments inspire confidence in the institution of Parliament and actually safeguard public interest.
Every effort must be put in place to make Kenya safer but no effort can surmount providing the basic needs of food, shelter, education, clean water and good healthcare system to the people. Employment opportunities enable a person to provide these and without it, crime increases.
This core, of human life therefore when being worked on should be highlighted and appreciated. The People’s Shujaaz Awards are meant to do just that. The Awards to spotlight the Parliamentarians that have made game-changing contributions in the House on issues of great public interest.
Shujaaz is the street Swahili equivalent of ‘heroes.’ In a Parliament where allegedly greed, personal business interests and corruption rule the day, Parliamentarians who go ahead to walk the talk and make the life of the public better should be celebrated.
Availing information on Parliamentarians and the contributions they made on the issues is the first reason behind the awards. Most of the time, Kenyans bash politicians and there is a risk that we may dismiss or fail to encourage those who are actually representing their interests.
Kenyans need to develop an interest in what goes on in Parliament. They should know what they send politicians to Parliament do on a daily basis. While this information is largely public, many either do not know how to get it or are totally unaware.
Their fellow Parliamentarians should also be challenged by seeing their colleagues taking a deeper interest in the affairs of the public. They should know that Kenyans are watching their performance and assess their own Parliamentary contributions. This should also challenge those who shy away from talking in Parliament to feel confident enough that so long as their focus is of public interest, Kenyans will appreciate.
Every year on Jamhuri day, the President always honors various Kenyans who have excelled in their work. Until this year when Kenyans were asked to nominate them, the process remained opaque. Some nominees seem to benefit merely by the office they hold and not substance of their work. People’s Shujaaz Awards seek to propose a different way of rewarding Kenyans who deserve these lifelong awards.
It is a win-win initiative for Kenyans in different spheres. Please go to the website www.mzalendo.com to exercise your right to choose the Parliamentarians who deserve to win. Let us embrace positivity in public affairs as it is not all gloomy.
Press Release – Mzalendo Launches the People’s Shujaaz awards
Nairobi, 28th November 2014 – Mzalendo Trust today launched the People’s Shujaaz Awards – an initiative to celebrate Parliamentarians that have excelled in championing issues of great public interest in Parliament – the National Assembly and Senate. The Parliamentarians were selected based on bills moved, contributions to bills, motions raised and statements issued from March 2013 to date.
“At the centre of these Awards are the bread and butter issues that drive Kenyan election campaigns and politics like food, health, water, education, security as well as core mandates of Parliament like devolution and budgetary oversight. The issues and list of nominees were arrived at through collaborative efforts between Mzalendo and other civil societies working on governance issues,” said Jessica Musila, Mzalendo’s Executive Director.
The inaugural People’s Shujaaz Awards has 10 categories with 3 nominees each. Mzalendo’s review of the Parliamentary business revealed discussions on health, water and budgetary oversight dominated debate. Kenyans have an opportunity to select their best choice in each category through online voting on www.mzalendo.com. Voting closes on 7th December 2014, 11.59pm and finalists will be announced and awarded gifts on 11th December 2014.
Kenyans spend a lot of time bashing politicians and there is a risk that we may dismiss or fail to encourage those who are actually representing their interests. People’s Shujaaz Awards is an attempt to fix that – we believe that it is important to point out that it is not all doom and gloom when it comes to Parliamentarians. The People’s Shujaaz Awards complement the National Honours the Presidency bestows on Kenyans who have given exemplary service to the country every year.
Through this initiative, Mzalendo seeks to gently nudge Parliamentarians to champion public interest, raise public awareness on the roles of MPs and Senators plus sensitize them on the need to hold their leaders to account. Mzalendo is a non-partisan Parliamentary Monitoring initiative which keeps an eye on Parliament and makes information on Parliamentarians and their activities easily accessible to the public.
For more information please contact:
Jessica Musila, 0714 391812, Jessica@mzalendo.com
For general enquiries email about the organization, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Napoleon Bonaparte famously defined a leader as a dealer in hope. Dealing in hope is no mean achievement to any who surmounts but which dictates character and commitment to a course of public interest. It must be evidenced in words and deeds. For instance, such a leader would not only call to order the men stripping women naked in public, but use lawful means to have them arrested and prosecuted for their backward behavior.
The rising insecurity calls for our President to give hope to Kenyans that the country will not perish at the hands of a few criminals. It also calls for all elected leaders in their wisdom and respect for public office, to rise against religious and ethnic bigotry to use Constitutional powers to reign in the situation.
Kenya is not a country where leaders resign from office due to failure of undertaking their responsibilities. This means that someone must induce a process based on incompetence, gross misconduct and corruption among other issues. It is clear that incompetence best describes how security has been handled since March 4, 2013.
Legislators yesterday rose above party affiliations to condemn the recent attack in Mandera in which 28 people were killed. While this is laudable and encouraged, they ought to move further beyond calling on the President to sack the Interior Cabinet Secretary Joe ole Lenku.
Article 152 (6) of the Constitution of Kenya, is elaborate on how an MP can initiate the process of removing a Cabinet Secretary and if he or she gets the threshold, a select committee is formed and if grounds are reached and the House passes that resolution, the President has no choice but to dismiss the Cabinet Secretary.
In addition Article 152 (5) (b) empowers the President to dismiss a Cabinet Secretary. The threshold an MP can initiate the removal may not have been reached but certainly the President can use his discretion.
Removing the Inspector General of Police David Kimaiyo requires someone to petition the National Assembly who will then discuss it, form a select committee to investigate and if findings are above board and if a majority agrees, ask the President to form a tribunal to remove him from office. This process may not be known by many but those who know should do something especially because the Inspector General has a four year non-renewable term which means he probably ‘lacks an incentive’ to deliver a safer republic.
Article 245 (d) cites incompetence as a ground for dismissal while (f) adds any other just cause as reason for the President to remove the Inspector General after the necessary procedures are followed.
The Constitution does not provide for sacred cows. If Kenya is a country guided by the rule of law, it must be seen that there are no sacred cows, without prejudice, as the lives of Kenyans are paramount.
By Alan Masakhalia
Kenyan’s have over the years suffered at the hands of corrupt and at times brutal and trigger happy Police Officers who were a law unto themselves.
With the setting up of the Independent Policing Oversight Authority (IPOA) there was obvious relief to Kenyans as we now had a place to run to when abused by rogue officers, unlike in the past when a police officer would be reported to his fellow colleagues, who would hurriedly discard the complaint immediately you left the station, IPOA had come to address our plight.
IPOA on its part hasn’t disappointed Kenyans, it has among other things ensured that the flawed police recruitment is nullified, it has ensured that trigger happy officers are brought to book hence effectively bringing to a close the era of rampant extra judicial killings, simply put IPOA has been instrumental in stemming impunity in the police force.
It thus comes as no surprise that police officers countrywide are up in arms against IPOA calling for its disbandment, citing alleged harassment!
That police backed by some parliamentarians have hatched plans to strip IPOA of its autonomy and place it under the National Police Service Commission (NPSC) is most regrettable. This is a very ill timed scheme aimed at weakening IPOA and rendering it ineffective in its core task of ensuring police are held accountable and are answerable for their deeds or misdeeds.
I thus call upon all well meaning MPs, who love Kenya and believe in safeguarding citizens essential freedoms to shoot down the Police Oversight Authority (Repeal) Bill, 2014 that is currently before them.
Butula Constituency – Busia County
The thinking around revenue sharing between National government and County government has been a subject of discussion for the past few months. The Commission on Revenue Allocation (CRA) has held various forums, finalized its proposals and sent them to the Senate for consideration and adoption. The new proposal is a slight departure from the current one and if adopted will be used for the next three years.
The current formula in operation is distributed as follows; population (45%), equal share (25%), poverty (20%), land area (8%) and fiscal accountability (2%). This formula has seen counties receive billions of shillings and although the Controller of Budget (CoB) has raised absorption issues, counties have been able to lay the ground work for devolution.
Yet, a critical concern has been whether there is adequate information and data to inform better resource allocation. There is need for better public awareness on how resources are shared and to establish avenues for receiving their views for consideration. Data is useful as it informs where the drivers of cost lie and determines prioritization of limited resources.
CRA has refined the current formula and reduced fiscal responsibility and poverty but added personal emoluments and development as new parameters while retaining the rest. The proposed formula includes; population (45%), equal share (25%), poverty (18%), land area (8%), fiscal responsibility (1%), personnel emoluments factor (2%) and development factor (1%).
The International Budget Partnership (IBP) organized a public forum to discuss this new formula where they invited the public but also CRA to hear views from Kenyans on what informed this new formula. An emerging and profound issue from the forum and which Kenyans brought out during the IBP County visits is the issue of fairness. What are the parameters that should inform a fair division of revenues among counties?
To determine a measure of fairness, issues like poverty, disease prevalence, ability to generate revenue, and available data were some of the provoking considerations. On poverty for instance, would it be fair to allocate a county less resources than another based on its perceived wealth? On ability to generate revenue, would it be fair to allocate more resources to a county that generates more than the one that generates less?
A measure of fairness between the National and County governments is likely to be forever contentious. But the conversation must be had on how whatever resources have been allocated, as a basket fund, to counties will be fairly disbursed.
If adopted, the proposed formula will help reduce the inequalities that are not only among sub-counties but also among wards within a sub-county. A good transfer system should be predictable but also avoid sudden and drastic change.
This new formula includes historical realities like bloated staff in some counties and is futuristic in terms of the development factor taking over from poverty. The proposal promises stability which is crucial as it did not deviate much from the current one. Is it fair? What are your thoughts?
Ongoing efforts to legislate in the mining sector are crucial and laudable in instilling proper governance in the sector. The law when it comes to effect will not only have better provisions like the current one but align the regime to contemporary realities of technology, transparency and accountability, public participation and other constitutional requirements among others.
The current law dates back to the colonial period and is therefore ‘archaic’ and not suited to present realities. Mr. Stephen Mwakesi, a program officer at the Kenya Chamber of Mines tweeted “took five hours, 45 minutes, 110 amendments to change Kenya’s 1940 Mining Act….”
The new law which is awaiting the President’s assent has reopened a supremacy war between the Senate and the National Assembly. The Bill was passed by the National Assembly and the Senate is aggrieved that it was not consulted since it touches on devolution. For instance, it proposes sharing of royalties and fees among national government, counties and the community.
At the same time, there is an ongoing process at the Senate led by Senator Agnes Zani to also pass a law for the Mining sector. To avoid duplication of efforts it would only be fair to let the Senate give input to the National Assembly Bill that was recently forwarded to the President for signing into law.
Kenya needs to avoid the resource curse problems that have faced mineral rich countries in Africa. For the most part poverty levels and human rights violations have increased and deplorable infrastructure persisted. The law should also help to guard against elite capture of Kenya’s mineral wealth.
Present realities of the mining sector also compel stakeholders especially Parliament to ensure the country’s citizens benefit directly and indirectly and use the revenue to improve livelihoods. Some minerals so far discovered and which have potential to transform livelihoods include oil, iron ore, titanium, coal, rare earths and gold among many others.
Managing the expectations of communities resident in the mineral rich areas is important to avoid conflicts. There should also be a clear demarcation of roles and responsibilities of all interested parties: the national and county governments, local communities and the mining companies.
The revenues will be better managed with a coherent and instructive law. That law alongside a policy that the Ministry of Mining has been working on will help inform issues like on licenses, fees and requirements for mining investments in the country. For potential investors and stakeholders at large, the rule of law and abiding to it by the authorities is imperative.
As such, the endless grandstanding and turf battles between the National Assembly and the Senate only serve to distract Kenyans from essential matters. Parliament represents the collective will of the people and has the responsibility to develop a good mining law to ensure the revenues are used for the betterment of society. Kenya is bigger than our individual or corporate interests. On a law, as weighty as this one is, all critical voices must be heard!
The rising insecurity in the country has to be handled with the seriousness it deserves. Security is one of the primary guarantees a government must offer its citizens. The current administration has handled the security docket in an incompetent, ineffective, inefficient or unconcerned manner.
Wanton loss of life has been reported in many parts of Kenya. In 2013, residents of Bungoma were killed mercilessly for a whole month unabated. The violence moved to Mandera, Garissa and Mombasa among other towns. Last week’s massacre of 21 police officers in Kapedo, Turkana County in a similar manner to the Baragoi one in 2012 where 42 officers died demonstrates the laxity with which the government treats security.
The government’s response has been generally slow and same lame fixes have been touted every time. Legislators from the joint Parliamentary committee on National Cohesion and Equal Opportunities led by chairman Johnston Sakaja recently vowed to push for amendment to the penal code for cattle rustlers be treated as suspects of murder and robbery with violence. They opined that these stiffer charges will help reduce the vice but it’s doubtful this would check the menace.
The flip side to that is how insecurity related incidences affecting the President and senior political figures have been addressed in record time. When the President was heckled at a function in Migori and former Prime Minister Raila Odinga attacked at a Coastal rally, the suspects were quickly arrested and arraigned in court. These two incidents affirm the ability of government to provide prompt security service and the same should be extended to all Kenyans without prejudice.
Article 238 (1) of the Constitution on the principles of national security is clear that ‘national security is the protection against internal and external threats to Kenya’s territorial integrity and sovereignty, its people, their rights, freedoms, property, peace, stability and prosperity and other national interests.’ Major re-organization of the security sector in line with the 2010 Constitution has not borne fruit yet.
While poor pay and housing have been challenges to the sector since Kenya’s independence; poor coordination seems to be the greatest obstacle to effective service delivery. An IPOA’s report released in October cited poor coordination as the main course for slow response to attacks in the Coast of Kenya. The report also revealed corruption as a police officer attached to the Anti-Terrorism Police Unit allegedly helped terrorists to smuggle arms from Somalia, which were then used to launch the Mpeketoni attacks in Lamu County. Such reports reveal the state of disarray in the sector.
Hard decisions have to be made. Human life must be valued by the political leadership. The security docket must be handled with the seriousness it deserves. Office holders must be responsive to their call of duty and restore Kenyan life and dignity. Every Kenyan deserves Presidential level security as the past has shown, it is doable.
A recent report on Constituency Development Fund (CDF) use published by the CDF Board calls for deeper interrogation on how exactly these public funds should be allocated and utilized. The Board declined to approve proposals from 137 constituencies as it termed them ‘not of public interest’.
Some reflection of what these legislators wanted would put it to better context. Voi constituency sought to use CDF money to take teachers on trips it termed “inter-county benchmarking”. Turkana Central Constituency wanted a Toyota Land Cruiser and a pick-up “fitted with all accessories, including electronic and manual winches”. The Land Cruiser would have cost Sh6.5 million and the pick-up Sh6 million. The constituency in the arid Turkana County, with poor electricity and internet connection also wanted to hire a consultant to develop “an online bursary application system, students’ database, website, Facebook and Twitter handle and its management for one year.”
Many other projects would largely be duplication as they are functions of either the national government or county governments. Some critical issues arise from the above. The first is what informed these projects? The constitutional imperative and expectation of public participation is more likely to have been ignored. It is not possible that Turkana Central Constituency residents would prefer a want over a need.
Secondly, how and what should constituencies prioritize? Resources are always limited and only prudent prioritization will inform allocations that would benefit the people. Each constituency has its own dynamics and a ‘one size fit all’ solution cannot suffice. From the two examples, it is likely that the CDF offices decided on these projects from Nairobi.
There are also concerns over the constitutionality of CDF. Some critiques have argued that the fund violates various provisions of the Constitution. For instance, the Institute of Social Accountability (TISA) has a pending case in court in which it seeks to have the CDF declared unconstitutional and have it restructured in line with the current Constitution.
CDF is critical to poverty alleviation and economic development. It is another form of decentralized power and functions, apart from devolution, whose funds should be directed at ensuring the lives of Kenyans, are better.
What happens in the CDF planning stage matters. The planning must be as transparent as possible and include people’s input right from the committee selection through to the projects management. The people must come together to discuss and prioritize what projects they want funds allocated for and in what areas.
The constituency is recognized as a devolved unit at the Sub-county level. It therefore means that constituencies must work together with county governments to ensure that there is no duplication of projects. They have to be complementary right from the planning stage.
MPs have been very critical of Governors in how they spend their money. It cannot be that the practice of preaching water and drinking wine is condoned. MPs have to respect and follow the law to ensure the electorate feel the benefit of their leadership positions and associate with them.
Supreme Court Judge Justice Njoki Ndung’u arguably reflects how best women Parliamentarians have a critical role in politics. Through focusing on one issue, sexual offences and drilling it down, she was able to birth the Sexual Offences Act 2006. The journey towards realizing that law was fraught in many hurdles but she never lost sight of what she wanted to achieve.
Today, while sexual offences continue to occur, the current regime is incomparable to before. Tougher penalties with broader definitions are ensuring that sex pests are locked out of society for more years. Society in general must be better enlightened through various forums while some repugnant cultural practices must be fought tooth and nail.
This highlights the debate around women inclusion in political office. Justice Njoki was nominated in the 2003-2007 Parliament and this birthed that law. Women continue to have a tougher challenge to win political office fairly in a contest with their male counterparts.
At the moment, constitutional provisions in Article 27 (8) and 81 (3) inform efforts towards ensuring that no gender has more than two thirds in public office. Reaching this milestone through appointments is straight forward. However where people are expected to exercise their democratic rights; more effort and tact is necessary.
The National Gender and Equality Commission (NGEC) is currently working on mechanisms of realizing that constitutional imperative. The law they come up with will be one hurdle passed. The real devil lies in culture and political parties.
Women lead in all other spheres of life including some homes except politics. Most cultures do not believe that a woman is an equally capable individual of leading a certain political constituency. Those who vie and win have to undergo a lot of cultural hurdles including in some areas convincing elders of their capabilities. This therefore calls for massive targeted civic education.
Political parties must also show leadership. They are the bedrock of political leadership. The law governing political parties must equally be amended to compel them to come up with strategies that will see more women in positions of leadership and critically well positioned for main elections.
In addition, the patron-client relationship in our politics where wealth is a good indicator of whether one will be elected needs to be addressed. Early restrictions on availing candidates to the electoral commission, like political parties to submit their candidates list at least six months before the elections, can be used to shift the debate from monetary influence to ideology. Ideology should inform the kind of development that aspiring leader will bring if elected.
Affirmative action to increase the number of women in political office is not necessarily a pedestal but recognizes the multiplicity of factors that reduce their role in active politics. It is this recognition that first birthed their nomination by political parties to either Parliament or County Assemblies. Only when better structures are in place, will merit and pure political campaigning be the basis for their inclusion.