Budget estimates reveal increase in spending but at what cost!

Posted by on 18th May 2015

Categories: Uncategorized

Critical to determining how bread and butter is allocated to who, why and how much is the budget. The budget guides how the development of a country or county will be curved out in a given a financial year, so citizens need pay it some attention and engage in its development.

In Kenya, the government embraced Program Based Budgeting (PBB) in 2012. PBB can be described as a budgeting structure where money is distributed by program or functional area with an emphasis on the latter’s service delivery objectives.

A good program budget should explain the overall mission and objectives of the budget, clearly link priorities to programs, explain changes over time in allocations and expenditure and relate challenges and objectives in the sector to budget allocations and how the challenges would be addressed.

On 30th April, the Ministry of Finance published the budget estimates for the financial year 2015/16. It is instructive to note that with county governments taking over some functions earlier performed by the national government, looking through the estimates will help tell where the national government’s priorities are.

Some key issues of the previous budgets’ 2013/14 and 2014/15 should help interrogate the proposed estimates. One is that over the two financial years education received the largest share. Secondly, the three sectors (education, security and infrastructure and energy) have accounted for 64 percent of the total budgets over the period.

In the proposed 2015/16 budget, government is set to make big changes in sector priorities.  Infrastructure and energy sectors will have the highest spending at 27% displacing education from the helm. On the other hand, 18% of the budget will be spent on debt repayment.

According to budget analysis released by the International Budget Partnership (IBP) last week, Ministries of Lands and Housing, Gender and Youth plus Devolution have excelled in their absorption capacity. Even so, development related expenditure needs to improve substantially. In the next budget an increase in programs like rail transport, cabinet affairs, tourism and security is expected.

Questions that still need to be addressed include: How dependent are the sectors/ministries receiving large shares of funding on external resources? Should the estimates provide more funding to sectors/ministries that have historically been able to spend it or to those that have had spending challenges?

These issues should arouse an interest in more Kenyans to read the estimates and contribute, before the actual budget is read this June. It cannot be that budgets are devoid of public input and that even when avenues are provided, few take cognizant of them and attend.

‘Power of the Purse’ lies with Parliament, as the people’s representatives. Although Parliamentarians budgetary choices are often informed by projects in their regions, alignment to national priorities, implementation plans and audits the public can still inform the choices they make. Do you know what the estimates say about your county and constituencies plans? Is it aligned to your goals for better service delivery within your neighborhood? What would you like to see in the budget? Kindly let your Members of the National Assembly (MNAs) and Senators know.

Two Thirds Gender Rule Tenable

Posted by on 8th May 2015

Categories: Uncategorized

Debate on the realization of two thirds gender principle has elicited mixed reactions. Some reactions have been inaccurate while others from leaders usually expected to steer debate send the wrong message to the public.

Kenyans needs to recognize that the overwhelming support they gave to the Constitutional enactment entailed the gender requirement to ensure there is not more than two thirds of one gender in elective and appointive office. While appointive is more easily attainable, elective is not since it is pegged on many other factors.

In recent days, this issue has sparked debate primarily because the deadline for attaining it is August 27th 2015, as directed by the Supreme Court in 2012. Two main issues drive the Two Third’s Gender principle debate.

One, the chair of the legal affairs committee Hon. Samuel Chepkonga published a Constitutional amendment Bill which states that the realization of the two thirds principle be progressive. Hon. Chepkonga’s choice of words in effect dents any near future realization of the issue. By saying progressive, the proposed bill opens a door for an endless discussion of the issue.

Secondly, the Speaker of the National Assembly stated that Women Representative positions and nominated seats should be removed and in their place, 100 women be nominated. While the speaker has no vote, his sentiments send a message of a partisan chair who could oversee a critical governance issue.

Major opponents of this principle often cite the costs of implementing it. However, research by the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) in conjunction with Action Aid and the National Women Steering Committee (NWSC) has proven that the two Third Gender principle is tenable without much budget implications. It is clear from the research that:

  1. i) If 75 women are elected to Parliament; 70 to National Assembly and five to Senate, there would be no need to nominate any or amend the Constitution;
  2. ii) An additional seat in the National Assembly costs sh21.1M annually and sh31.3M one in the Senate seat. From the Auditor General’s report, unaccounted for budgetary allocations are much more than what it would cost to implement this provision. For instance, the audited accounts of 2012/2013, reveal that Ministries and Departments failed to avail documents in support of various expenditure in excess of sh33B.

To move this principle forward, political will is key. The President must also stand up to be counted as he Jubilee manifesto was unequivocal on their support of the gender principle.

Research has also shown that Kenyans are as likely to elect women as much as men. This means that if supported, there would be no need to nominate any woman. This spotlights the importance of political party support in realizing this requirement.

The National Gender and Equality Commission (NGEC) proposed that article 177 be lifted and used to ensure Parliament complies just as County Assemblies. Perhaps the debate should be on counter proposals and how to enrich them and not defeat them. What say you?


Public Service not fit for rejected politicians

Posted by on 2nd May 2015

Categories: Uncategorized

President Kenyatta appointed 302 Kenyans to various parastatal positions, making a bold move to appoint many candidates who were rejected by voters in the ballot. The move by the President is not only regrettable but also unfortunate at a time when so many things in government are going wrong.

It was an unprecedented move to not only see many rejected politicians being rescued through appointments, but also relatives, brothers and sisters of the same family being appointed. This is really sad as there is no shortage of qualified and diligent Kenyans who can deliver.

Though, it is not wrong to appoint a rejected politician, one must ensure that whoever is appointed is credible and diligent in their work and matched with an appropriate parastatal. In fact, they can bring in some experience and quality that can help steer that organization to higher heights. But this should not be haphazardly done as it seems.

Parastatals boards are pivotal institutions that define and determine the policy direction of an organization. They also approve multimillion shilling projects, paid for by tax-payers money. Previously, parastatals have been embroiled in political and legal battles, some which have not only dented their image but also deprived many of due services.

Our politicians look at elective office as a career and consequently parastatal board jobs are often avenues to fundraise for their next political battles. The consequences of such appointments are many. One, these politicians will resign in due time for the next elections. The effect of this is that the institution will lack their great input over the period of their absence to inform its decisions.

Secondly, politicians are likely to bring their alleged incompetence to the boards. Boards do not perform daily routine of the institutions but as they define policy and approve budgets, the effect of this reverberates in how the organizations are run. Two or so sittings a year can make or break an organization.

Thirdly, the message being sent to Kenyans is that you need to be politically correct for you to merit an appointment in public service. This practice leads to people vying for political office for the sake of it so that when the time comes, they know they may be considered for some appointive position.

Lastly, this practice makes Kenyans lose confidence in their leadership. Leadership is about perception and leaders need to send the right messages in their decisions; that they put the public first. Appointing rejected politicians sends a negative message; that public service is a preserve of a few.

It is in such times that Kenya deserves a Parliament that can ably check the executive. Such a Parliament would call to order and also veto decisions of the executive that are questionable. Our current Parliament is far from the ideal, and sitting MPs need to take their responsibility seriously. Kenyans also need to question their government over every retrogressive decision it has taken. This cannot wait until the elections.

Let us rethink our elections preparedness

Posted by on 24th April 2015

Categories: Uncategorized

Elections lie at the core of how governance is established and developed. The Presidential Elections petition presented to the Supreme Court after the 2013 General Elections, warrants interrogation so that any lapses in law and practice can be rectified before the next elections.

It is on this premise that stakeholders converged at the ‘Rethinking Elections Management in Kenya’ forum to audit the elections and the Supreme Court decision, as well as interrogate the case, judgment and consider useful steps to amend its shortcomings.

The forum highlighted five key issues. The first was the procurement and the use of the Biometric Voter Registration (BVR) and the Electronic Voter Identification Device (EVID) Kits. It was clear that the investment made was not only inadequate but also the kits were not robustly tested to check possibilities of failure. As it turned out, technology failed to deliver.

Secondly, the need for better election preparedness was spotlighted. Most Kenyans look at the election as an event, yet in reality, election is a process and only polling is an event. This attitude has significant implications on not only candidates in the polls but also voters, political parties, the electoral commission and the judiciary, as major decisions are often made last minute and in a hurry.

Thirdly, the fidelity of the voter register was questioned. During the election queries on what the final voter register comprised of and who had access to it were raised and the Supreme Court did not provide a conclusive response. In future, Kenyans need to own, interrogate and inspect this register because it determines participants in the election, who wins and how the country will be governed.

The fourth issue was the political party nomination and dispute resolution thereafter. Most political parties bungled their nominations and the dispute resolution processes revealed institutional weaknesses and confusion which must be addressed fast. In fact, great candidates were ousted in the shambolic nominations. In Kenya, nominations by a strategic political party are actually like the main election as the winner is often a shoe-in the polls; hence the need for more rigour.

The last issue raised was the composition of the electoral commissioners. Elections management is about perception and there is need to ensure those who lead the process can be held accountable by key players in the election e.g. political parties.

Meanwhile in Parliament, Hon. David Ochieng’ has tabled a bill that seeks to change the election date from Second Tuesday of August as set in the Constitution to the third Monday of December. The reasoning is that August disrupts the current cycle of things including the education calendar but December does not.

It is clear that many issues need to be resolved now and not wait for 2017. Kenyans need to interrogate election related laws and push for their improvement as well as monitor election preparations by the IEBC, Registrar of Political Parties and political parties. Decisions made have to put Kenyans interest’s first, not just politicians!

May Integrity be our shield and defender!

Posted by on 17th April 2015

Categories: Uncategorized

At no time in the history of Kenya have integrity issues been highlighted at a scale like the previous one month. These alleged integrity issues have spotlighted corruption and abuse of abuse by key officers in the public service including Parliamentarians, cabinet secretaries and heads of various public institutions.

In the National Assembly, the focus has been on the Public Accounts Committee (PAC), albeit even the Agriculture committee members are alleged to also have been compromised to alter findings of investigations. The Powers and Privileges Committee probed PAC affairs and tabled its findings in the National Assembly.

The Powers and Privileges committee findings were far from robust, which would have helped to stem the vice, and also send a clear message that corruption will not be condoned in the August House. They simply requested four MPs who made unsubstantiated allegations to apologize or miss four sittings, the four members were banned from PAC and a new committee be constituted within 7 days.

The committee would have laid a major milestone, if it had made public its findings on involvement of senior civil servants in corrupt deals and recommended actions should be taken against them and any other person. Maybe the committees work was hindered by the ongoing investigations by the Ethics and Anti Corruption Commission (EACC).

According to the EACC’s list of shame senior state and public servants stand accused of various corruptions related issues like abuse of office, flaunting procurement procedures, mismanagement and embezzlement of funds.

The President set a 90 day period for them to step aside and pave way for investigations, a process which is currently ongoing. It is unfortunate that a timeline was set to unearth the alleged rot. A timeline restricts the ability to work independently and conclusively, but perhaps EACC will do a good job.

It is critical that the process does not turn out to be a public relations exercise. In the past, all officers who were asked to step aside went back to their positions. It is this skepticism that greets many Kenyans, including how the PAC investigations were handled and determined.

What all these bring out is poor adherence to the rule of law in public service and diligence in executing public duties. It should be noted that Kenyans have been fighting issues of poverty, ignorance and disease since independence. These actions by public servants cast aspersions on ensuring that these three issues are a thing of the past soon.

Leadership comes to mind when talking about integrity and enabling a country move forward. As noted earlier, one does not have to be proved guilty, for them to resign from office, pave way for proper investigations and instill public confidence.

It is this confidence that ensures people provide information to defeat vices in society like insecurity, theft and other unlawful acts. But all must walk the integrity talk for Kenya to be what it can be, a great nation.

Parliament must seize security matters urgently

Posted by on 10th April 2015

Categories: Uncategorized

Innocent Kenyan lives cannot continue to be lost unabated while Parliamentarians as their representatives take a back seat. Government is primarily supposed to provide security to its citizens but President Uhuru’s administration so far seems to have bungled the job. Terrorist attacks have taken away many innocent lives and the recent Garissa Attack adds to the concern.

Parliament in its oversight and representation roles has the mandate and power to bring this to an end. Parliamentarians approve budget allocations to the national security organs but these remain shrouded in secrecy which hinders institutional accountability.

Security is a national government function and current assertions by national government officials including the President and Interior Cabinet Secretary appear to be empty rhetoric.  They keep assuring Kenyans of improved security yet insecurity runs rampant, casting doubt on the government’s competence to address security challenges the country currently faces.

In the recent Garissa attack, some politicians like the Majority Leader Aden Duale have stated on their social media accounts that the attack was locally organized by local politicians. These are very leading comments which need to not only be investigated but also urgently addressed.

Hon. Duale is a core leader in government and needs to avail the information he has to security agencies for their action. In previous attacks, politicians have taken to political rallies to castigate security agencies, they however do little on the floor of the house.




Following the Westgate attack in 2013, Parliament undertook investigations into the circumstances leading to the attack, the responses and put forward recommendations to avoid such incidences in future. Unfortunately, the report  was watered down. For instance, National Security machinery had received warnings regarding the impending attack, and notes the general laxity by the police over terror warnings, but it left out failures in national security bodies.

Inaction on matters security is a great injustice to Kenyans who bestore their trust and responsibility in their elected leaders. They expect and deserve action to protect their lives, property and safeguard Kenya’s sovereignty.

It has been argued and rightly so that radicalization is the main cause of increased terrorism in the country. The argument that unemployment is the reason is fading away guided by the reality that one of the attackers has been identified as a learned person from an okay family.

This begs the question as to what is the role of Parliamentarians in ending the vice! They attend mosques, visit communities and fund projects in these neighborhoods. Their supporters, friends and staff in their offices know these youths being radicalized or those doing the teachings. They need to heed the President’s call that security starts with you by intervening at this early, critical learning stage.

Politicians have a central role in the lives of people as their words and actions are followed in great measure. They should put their position to good use and avail intelligence to security agencies. Parliamentarians should also be vocal against radicalization in the communities they represent. They owe it to Kenyans both individually and collectively.

To Curb Corruption Integrity in Public Office is a Must!

Posted by on 3rd April 2015

Categories: Uncategorized

The List of Shame made public this week has shed light into corruption in government. Commonly used avenues of corruption include: procurement procedures, abuse of office, diverting public funds from intended use and questionable wealth. Various public officers allegedly have cases to answer.

Most of the elected officials have declined to step aside, citing various issues, either law or jurisdiction, as directed by the President. Stepping aside, while only a Kenyan practice, does not amount to being guilty. Every accused person is presumed innocent until proven guilty by the courts.

Tabling of the list of shame in Parliament coincided with the Parliamentary Initiatives Network (PIN) release of a report on the implementation of chapter 6 by all arms of government. The report titled; Towards Hazy Horizons; spotlights shortcomings that still exist in making leadership and integrity matters a reality as envisioned in the Constitution.

Guided by jurisprudence from the courts, the report affirms the purpose of Chapter six is to set higher standards of integrity for persons seeking to serve as state officers. The report backed its leadership culpability claims with the case between Trusted Society of Human Rights Alliance v The Attorney General and Others. In that case, the High Court observed that

“…a person is said to lack integrity when there are serious unresolved questions about his honesty, financial probity, scrupulousness, fairness, reputation, soundness of his moral judgment or his commitment to the national values enumerated in the Constitution. In our view, for purposes of the integrity test in our Constitution, there is no requirement that the behaviour, attribute or conduct in question has to rise to the threshold of criminality. It therefore follows that the fact that a person has not been convicted of a criminal offence is not dispositive of the inquiry whether they lack integrity or not…it is enough if there are sufficient serious, plausible allegations which raise substantial unresolved questions about one’s integrity.”

It is therefore evident that a person needs not to be criminally culpable for them to have questionable integrity.

The lack of transparency around procurement, tendering and signed agreements provide avenues for looting in public office. Corruption is not limited to bribery alone. For instance, keeping wealth declaration forms confidential undermines transparency and they must be made public.

In practice, most public officials privatize public resources. Audits of their lives before, during and after office reveal this phenomenon.

Kenya’s problem is not laws but implementation of laws. Kenyan laws are adequately robust in fighting corruption and providing provisions for integrity to inform decisions in public office. People need to resign when implicated as a sense of honor not when told by someone else.

It is time that those convicted of corruption also have their wealth, which was acquired illegally, confiscated and used for public good. It is also time those implicated in corruption to not just step aside, but resign to allow to fair and proper investigations. What say you?

Employment Bill does not discriminate on age

Posted by on 30th March 2015

Categories: Uncategorized

In this second part of the interview with Hon. Johnson Sakaja, he discusses reasons behind setting up a new institution and not amending existing laws within the Ministry of labor. He also discloses the interests both local and international for the Bill, how it will be devolved to all Counties, including areas with less ICT penetration, the public interface of the registry and what will be public or not and reasons behind requesting for this information and in-built checks and balances. In addition, the Bill will be of benefit to all, regardless of the age including the informal sector albeit the use of the word youth is for emphasis purposes. Finally, Hon. Sakaja states that the authority, once set up is what will assist to improve the education system to ensure courses studied are in line with market dynamics.

Find it here


You can find the Bill here

Kenya Needs a ‘Deliberate and Focused’ approach on Unemployment, says Hon. Sakaja

Posted by on 24th March 2015

Categories: Uncategorized

Hon. Johnson Sakaja is sponsoring the National Youth Employment Authority (NYEA) Bill (2015) which is meant to be a one-stop-shop for anyone looking for employment. The Bill is premised on the lack of accurate data on unemployment in Kenya and knowledge among youth, especially graduates on how to go about seeking for a job. It is an added effort by Government to help people find jobs, both locally and internationally. In doing this, the Bill proposes to provide incentives to both public and private institutions who use the Authority’s database to recruit staff. In this first part of a two part series interview, Hon. Sakaja shares his thoughts that informed the Bill.

Find it here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmgrwUUpS2s

You can also find the Bill here

Corruption allegations against Parliamentary Committees a Disgrace

Posted by on 14th March 2015

Categories: Uncategorized

Over the past one month, news on parliamentary committees and budgetary allocations have painted the institution charged with legislation, representation and oversight as corrupt and self-centered.

Serious corruption allegations have been leveled against the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) members including its chairman. These allegations have been about its members soliciting and taking bribes from senior public servants to influence the outcome of a report under investigations.

PAC audits all public accounts to ensure that public money was used prudently. The 11th Parliament PAC has been auditing some serious issues including the IEBC’s conduct of the 2013 General Elections, Auditor General’s Accounts, the Hustler’s jet leasing and investigations into the questionable transfer of Sh2.3 billion from the Office of the President between 2012 and 2013 among others. These are core institutions of public interest hence vested interests abound.

A recorded conversation between MPs Samuel Arama, Ababu Namwamba, Junet Mohammed and CORD coalition leader Raila Odinga has brought out the corrupt dealings associated with MPs and other senior government officers. The recording implicates MPs from both the Jubilee and CORD Coalitions in the practice which goes to show corruption is condoned and abetted so long as it caters to their interests. Hear the recording

On Thursday, the Budget committee bowed to pressure from MPs and dropped an allocation of Sh3 billion intended to public hearings and professional input. The bulk of Sh3 billion that was dropped from the proposed allocations was shared between the Parliamentary Service Commission (Sh1 billion) and the Constituency Development Fund (Sh1.38 billion).

That parliamentarians can be very selfish to the point of competing amongst each other to take bribes and implicate each other in order to influence reports is not only unfortunate but also shameful.

This behavior is contrary to the Constitution and Parliament standing orders. Article 75 of the Constitution is clear that state officers’ public and private behavior must avoid conflict of interest between their personal interest and public or official duties.  Compromising any public or official interest in favor of a personal interest demeans the office the officer holds. The standing orders further elaborate and give guidelines on this issue.

It is clear that corruption festers prominently at the committee level, which is pivotal in determining and shaping debate in the plenary. These strong allegations imply that whatever happens at the plenary is normally already decided upon and it is just a stamping exercise.

It is also clear that MPs who have been adversely mentioned are in breach of the Constitution and standing orders. A breach of law is a serious crime which should not be condoned. The Parliamentarians adversely mentioned have shown no remorse whatsoever. A parliamentary committees audit is recommended. The audit ideally should be carried out by representatives of the Independent Commissions with a view of prosecuting them in a court of law in order to set precedence, nip the vice and protect the dignity of the House.

What do you think?